The plume of polluted water from the spread farther than previously thought, new research suggests, stretching outside of Tampa Bay and more than 30 miles away to waters near Tarpon Springs.
The study sheds new light on the vast environmental toll of the wastewater emergency and adds more weight to the evidence that red tide and otherflaring in and around Tampa Bay during summer 2021 were linked to the nutrient-laden discharges from Piney Point, according to the study鈥檚 authors.
For a year after the disaster, researchers monitored water quality at four locations and collected water samples there biweekly. The 215 million gallons of tainted water leaving Piney Point had a unique 鈥渇ingerprint,鈥� which means scientists could identify and separate it from other pollution sources, according to Elise Morrison, an assistant professor at the University of Florida鈥檚 Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences and the study鈥檚 lead author.
One of the four locations selected 鈥� St. Joseph Sound offshore of Tarpon Springs 鈥� is not in Tampa Bay and was supposed to be a 鈥渞eference spot鈥� for the study. Researchers planned to compare it to Tampa Bay as a control site thought to be out of reach from Piney Point鈥檚 pollution plume.
But that鈥檚 not what happened: In May 2021, researchers identified nitrogen isotope signatures from Piney Point in St. Joseph Sound, far away from the former phosphate processing plant.
鈥淚t鈥檚 proof that the plume went out into the Gulf of Mexico, and was then transported northward, and southward most likely,鈥� said Dave Tomasko, executive director of the Sarasota Bay Estuary Program and an author of the study. The pollution was diluted by the time it reached that far north, he said, but it鈥檚 still noteworthy it was found at all.
The findings also validate the flow of pollution predicted by computer models in the weeks after the disaster, according to Tomasko. Those models showed the plume stretching north to St. Joseph Sound before it was documented in the real world.
Nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorus, can help fuel the growth of phytoplankton, or small organisms that live in the water. For their study, scientists monitored how those organisms responded to the nutrients released from Piney Point. They found diatoms (a type of phytoplankton) 鈥渞esponded quickly鈥� to the available nutrients near where pollution entered into the bay, and also in tucked-away spots, including Joe Bay and Bishop Harbor, Morrison said.
Piney Point underscores why it鈥檚 imperative to support organizations that keep an eye on water quality in the bay, because that data can be used to study how the bay responds to both natural events, like hurricanes, and human-made disasters.
鈥淭his research highlights the importance of protecting coastal water quality and ensuring that infrastructure failures do not negatively impact Tampa Bay water quality,鈥� Morrison wrote in an email. 鈥淪upporting long-term monitoring programs and collaborative research is critical to address complex challenges and find solutions to maintain coastal water quality and ecosystem health.鈥�
The in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, an international journal highlighting scientific findings.
In the months after the disaster, the waterbody Tomasko monitors regularly, Sarasota Bay, had some of the worst conditions he鈥檇 seen, he said. He remains convinced that the prolonged algal blooms were because of Piney Point, and these findings show it鈥檚 possible, he said.
If the pollution spread as far away as 30 miles or more north from the epicenter, it likely also flowed south, Tomasko said. The algae problems are now worse in the upper portion of Sarasota Bay than what has been monitored historically.
鈥淏y far 鈥� in my opinion 鈥� those releases were the worst impact to our coastal waters in decades: Not just a short-term impact in a limited area, but a detectable impact across an area from St. Joseph Sound down through Tampa Bay and into Sarasota Bay,鈥� Tomasko said. 鈥淚鈥檓 not convinced we鈥檙e over the impacts.鈥�
