As begins interviewing candidates for the school鈥檚 next president this week, a state representative has proposed a bill that would exempt those applying for president, provost or dean at state colleges and universities from Florida鈥檚 broad open records laws.
, proposed by , is not the first of its kind. In fact, a similar bill passed both the Florida House and Senate two decades ago, only to be vetoed by then-Governor Lawton Chiles.
Though currently introduced by Republicans, the bill is not partisan. In recent years, it was who filed similar in 2014, which was followed by filing soon after. Kerner鈥檚 passed the House, but Hays鈥 bill died in the Senate.
鈥淛ust because it failed once 鈥 if it鈥檚 a good bill and it makes sense, you want to keep working hard to try to get it done,鈥 Rommel said. 鈥淲e shouldn鈥檛 be at a disadvantage to other states when people are looking to make the move. We should be just as welcoming and have a similar selection process, so that we do get the best.鈥
Rommel, of Naples, introduced House Bill 351 last month alongside , who is also from Naples.
鈥淲hen you have a situation where current law impedes the progress necessary for our various institutions to be at their best, something needs to be done,鈥 Donalds said.
Proponents of the bill argue those qualified for positions, like university president, who are currently employed are reluctant to apply because their application will be disclosed publicly.
鈥淚鈥檓 not convinced, frankly,鈥 said Barbara Petersen, the president of the . 鈥淚f we look at who has been hired to lead our state universities, over the last however many years, I don鈥檛 know that we could do better.鈥
Petersen, who has been with FAF since 1995, says she sees similar bills to this one every few years.
Petersen says the organization has not seen any anecdotal evidence to support the claim that university presidential searches suffer due to the Sunshine Law.
In her 22 years with the foundation, Petersen says she meets with a representative maybe once or twice a session. Most recently, she met with Rommel last Tuesday to discuss coming to some sort of compromise on his bill.
鈥淗e understood our issues,鈥 Petersen said. 鈥淚鈥檓 not sure if we agree completely, but that鈥檚 not unusual. What is unusual is someone asking me to come talk to them. That doesn鈥檛 happen very often.鈥
House Bill 351 would work in conjunction with proposed by , who is also from Southwest Florida. The region is currently searching for a president to succeed at Florida Gulf Coast University.
Bradshaw says the bill is worth looking into.
鈥淚n my opinion, maintaining confidentiality until the candidates are invited to campus makes sense to me,鈥 Bradshaw said. 鈥淭hat said, I think the finalists are distinguished people in their own rites and in their own careers, so it is a very good pool of candidates.鈥
For Rommel, finding that quality pool of candidates each time is the bill鈥檚 ultimate goal.
鈥淭o me, it鈥檚 common sense, and it still gives the protections that we鈥檒l know who the real candidates are and we can publicly vet them,鈥 Rommel said. 鈥淎nd, then, hopefully, the university will get the best and the brightest.鈥
Petersen says she鈥檚 hopeful an understanding can be reached in the future but, for now, remains apprehensive about what this bill could mean if passed.
鈥淚 can bet you dollars to donuts that if we get this exemption this year for university presidents, we鈥檙e going to see it next year for county administrators, city attorneys, virtually everybody who鈥檚 part of the hiring process,鈥 Petersen said.
The First Amendment Foundation says, in 2014, 12 percent of the bills passed by the Florida Legislature were Sunshine Law exemptions. In the last 20 years, the amount of exemptions has quadrupled 鈥 totaling more than a thousand.
of Sarasota has also filed a Sunshine Law exemption bill, . Currently, attorney鈥檚 fees are awarded to people who win cases who were refused public records. His bill would change the language to say attorney鈥檚 fees 鈥渕ay be awarded.鈥
Copyright 2020 WGCU. To see more, visit .